A relação entre direito de assistência consular e direitos humanos: uma contribuição europeia para a humanização do direito internacional

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.27700

Palavras-chave:

Direitos de assistência consular., Direitos humanos., Caso Jadhav., Humanização do direito internacional., Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos Humanos.

Resumo

No contexto da interpretação do Artigo 36.1 (b) da Convenção de Viena sobre Relações Consulares (VCCR'63) de 1963 pela Corte Internacional de Justiça e pela Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos, este artigo ajuda a esclarecer como os desenvolvimentos do Direito Europeu reforçam a entendimento renovado do Artigo 36 VCCR '63 no que diz respeito à sua interação com o direito internacional dos direitos humanos. Como poderia uma jurisprudência em desenvolvimento do Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos do Humanos ligando os direitos consulares individuais a vários direitos diferentes garantidos pela Convenção Europeia dos Direitos Humanos - juntamente com a abordagem normativa quase constitucional da União Europeia, incluindo direitos consulares dentro dos direitos de cidadania e devido processo legal garantias comuns - condicionam a interpretação fortemente centrada no Estado do Artigo 36 VCCR '63 pela Corte Internacional de Justiça? O artigo objetiva enfatizar a necessidade de uma reflexão sobre um parâmetro para uma possível interpretação evolutiva, baseado numa abordagem prática e teleológica da decisão da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Jadhav (Índia v. Paquistão).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Eulalia W. Petit de Gabriel, Universidad de Sevilla

Profesora Titular de Universidad (Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales). Universidad de Sevilla. Grupo de Investigación: Estudios Internacionales y Europeos.

Referências

Abrisketa Uriarte, J. (2013). Las sentencias piloto: El Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, de juez a legislador. Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 65(1), 73-99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26180555?seq=1

Aceves, W. J. (2000). The right of information on consular assistance in the framework of the guarantees of the due process of law. Advisory Opinion OC-16-99. American Journal of International Law, 94(3), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555324

Ahmad, M. A. (1973). L’institution consulaire et le droit international: Étude de la Convention de Vienne du 24 avril 1963 sur les relations consulaires et la pratique des États dans ce domaine. Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.

Alston, P. (2014). Against a world court for human rights. Ethics and International Affairs, 28(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679414000215

Bailliet, C. M. (2013). Measuring compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The ongoing challenge of judicial independence in Latin America. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 31(4), 477-495. https://www.idunn.no/ntmr/2013/04/measuring_compliance_with_the_inter-american_court_of_human

Bluntschli, J. C., Lardy, C., & Rivier, A. (1881). Le droit international codifié. 3a ed. Guillaumin.

Brems, E. (2014). Should pluriform human rights become one? Exploring the benefits of human rights integration. European Journal of Human Rights, 447-470. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2891288

Brems, E. (2018, January 6). Smart Human Rights Integration. In E. Brems, & S. Ouald Chaib (eds.), Fragmentation and integration in human rights law: Users' perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishers. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3097499

Buergenthal, T. (2006). The evolving international human rights system. American Journal of International Law, 100, 783-807. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajil100&i=793

Buyse, A. C. (2009). The pilot judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: possibilities and challenges. Nomiko Vima, 57(8), 1913-1927. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lwukrn2013&i=955

Cançado Trindade, A. A. (2005). International Law for Humankind: Towards a new jus gentium - general course on public international law - part I, 316 recueil des cours de l'académie de droit international de la Haye. Nijhoff.

Cançado Trindade, A. A. (2011). The access of individuals to international justice. OUP Oxford.

Cebada Romero, A. (2013). El derecho internacional global: Una retórica útil para una transformación necesaria. Revista española de derecho internacional, 65(1), 15-42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26180553

Cerna, C. M. (2013, April). El-Masri v. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Eur. Ct. H.R.). International Legal Materials, 52(2), 558-622. https://doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.52.2.0558

Charnovitz, S. (2012, July). Correcting America’s continuing failure to comply with the Avena judgment. American Journal of International Law, 106(3), 572-581. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.3.0572

Crespo Navarro, E. (2017). Protection by affinity for unrepresented citizens of the European Union in the third countries. In: C. Jiménez Piernas, F. Pascual Vives, & L. Pasquali (eds.), Addressing the new challenges of the European Union: Solidarity and the protection of individuals (pp. 119-154). Giappichelli.

Commission of the European Communities (2003, February 19). Green paper on procedural safeguards for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union (COM/2003/75). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0075:FIN:EN:PDF

Commission of the European Communities (2004, April 28). Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on certain procedural rights for criminal proceedings (COM/2004/328). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2004:0328:FIN:en:PDF

Cottier, T., & Hertig Randall, M. (2003, January). The prospects of 21st century constitutionalism. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 7, 261-322.

Court of Justice of the European Union. (2015, October 6). Case C-650/13, Thierry Delvigne v Commune de Lesparre Médoc and Préfet de la Gironde. Grand Chamber. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?oqp=&for=&mat=or&lgrec=pt&jge=&td=%3BALL&jur=C%2CT%2CF&num=C-650%252F13&page=1&dates=&pcs=Oor&lg=&pro=&nat=or&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&language=en&avg=&cid=4164043.

De Hert, P., & Korenica, F. (2012). The doctrine of equivalent protection: Its life and legitimacy before and after the European Union's accession to the European convention on human rights. German Law Journal, 13(7), 874-895. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200020794

Decaux, E. (2011). The place of human rights courts and international criminal courts in the international system. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(3), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr023

De Mensch, F. A. (1846). Manuel pratique du Consulat, ouvrage consacré specialement aux Consuls de Prusse et des autres Etats formant le Zollverein. Brockhaus.

Domingo, R. (2011). Gaius, Vattel, and the new global law paradigm. European Journal of International Law, 22(3), 627-647. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr050

Dubey, A. (2017, November). The Jadhav case before the International Court of Justice. Indian Journal of International Law, 57, 357-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-017-0067-2

Duffy, E. W. (2010, March). The Avena act: An option to induce state implementation of consular notification rights after Medellin. Georgetown Law Journal, 98, 795-826. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/glj98&i=801

European Court of Human Rights. (2005, May 12). Case Öcalan v. Turkey, application no. 46221/99. Grand Chamber. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-69022

European Court of Human Rights. (2012a, July 21). Case of M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, application no. 40020/03. Second Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-112576

European Court of Human Rights. (2012b, December 13) Case of El-Masri v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, application no. 39630/09. Grand Chamber. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-11562

European Court of Human Rights. (2014, July 17). Case of Kim v. Russia, application no. 44260/13. First Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-145584

European Court of Human Rights. (2016, February 23). Case of Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, application no. 44883/09. Fourth Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162280.

European Court of Human Rights. (2017, October 19). Case of Lebois v. Bulgaria, application no. 67482/14. Fifth Section. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-177698.

European Court of Human Rights. (2018). Case Azzolina and Others v. Italy, application nos 28923/09 and 67599/10. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-5900024-7526266.

Faggiani, V. (2017). Los derechos procesales en el espacio europeo de justicia penal. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.

Falk, R. A. (1993). Human rights and state sovereignty (1981): The pathways of global constitutionalism. In R. A. Falk, R. C. Johansen, & S. S. Kim (eds.), The constitutional foundations of world peace: Logic and tinkering. Suny Press.

Field, D. D. (1876). Outlines of an international code. 2a ed. Baker, Voorhis & Company.

Fiore, P. (1890). Le droit international codifié et sa sanction juridique: Suivi d’un resumé historique des principaux traités internationaux. Chevalier-Marescq et. Cie Éditeurs.

French, D. (2006). Treaty interpretation and the incorporation of extraneous legal rules. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 281-314. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3663163?seq=1

Garlicki, L. (2007). Broniowski and after: On the dual nature of pilot judgements. In L. Caflisch, & L. Wildhaber (eds.), Liber amircoru luzius wildhaber, human rights–strasbourg views. N. P. Engel.

Glas, L. R. (2016). The functioning of the pilot-judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights in practice. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 34(1), 41-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411603400104

Gondek, M. (2005). Extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights: Territorial focus in the age of globalization?. Netherlands International Law Review, 52(3), 349-387. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1017/S0165070X05003499

Haider, D. (2013). The pilot-judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Helmersen, S. T. (2013). Evolutive treaty interpretation: legality, semantics and distinctions. Eur. J. Legal Stud., 6, 161-188. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ejls6&i=165

Heyking, A. (1930). La théorie et la pratique des services consulaires. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 34, 812-948.

Howell, N. M. (2013, June). A Proposal for US implementation of the Vienna convention's consular notification requirement. UCLA Law Review, 60(5), 1324-1381. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/uclalr60&i=1358

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2000). Advisory opinion OC-16/99 of October 1, 1999. Requested by the United Mexican States. The right to information on consular assistance in the framework of the guarantees of the due process of law. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_16_ing.pdf

International Court of Justice. (1992, November 2). Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/90

International Court of Justice. (1998, April 3). Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Paraguay v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/99

International Court of Justice. (1999, March 2). LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/104

International Court of Justice. (2003, January 9). Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/128

International Court of Justice. (2017, May 8). Jadhav (India v. Pakistan). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/168

Jenks, C. W. (1958). The common law of mankind. Praeger.

Jessup, P. C. (1956). Transnational law. Elliots Books.

King, H. (2009). The extraterritorial human rights obligations of states. Human Rights Law Review, 9(4), 521-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp028

Komanovics, A. (2017, March 9). Transition from commitment to compliance: The efficacy of international human rights tribunals. Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, 20, p. 321-349. https://doi.org/10.17979/afdudc.2016.20.0.1927

Kuhnert, K. (2006). Bosphorus-double standards in European human rights protection. Utrecht Law Rev., 2, 177. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/utrecht2&i=373

Larsen, K. M. (213). Compliance with judgments from the European Court of Human Rights: The court’s call for legislative reforms. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 31(4), 496-512. https://www.idunn.no/ntmr/2013/04/compliance_with_judgments_from_the_european_court_of_human_?languageId=2

Leach, P., Hardman, H., & Stephenson, S. (2010). Can the European Court’s pilot judgment procedure help resolve systemic Human Rights violations? Burdov and the failure to implement domestic court decisions in Russia. Human Rights Law Review, 10(2), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq011

Leach, P., Hardman, H., Stephenson, S., & Blitz, B. K. (2010). Responding to systemic human rights violations: An analysis of pilot judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and their impact at national level. Intersentia.

Leanza, U. (1997). Le droit international: D'un droit pour les Etats à un droit pour les individus. Une vision de la théorie et de la pratique des relations internationales contemporaines. In J. C. Llorens (coord.), Cursos euromediterráneos Bancaja de Derecho Internacional (pp. 27-222). Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.

Lee, L. T. (1966). The Vienna Convention on Consular Relation. Sijthoff.

Lee, L. T. (1969, January). Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. International Conciliation, 37, 41-[ii]. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/intcon37&i=859

Lock, T. (2010). Beyond bosphorus: The European Court of Human Rights' case law on the responsibility of member states of international organisations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Hum. Rts. L. Rev., 10, 529. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hrlr10&i=535

Mallory, C. (2016, June). Abolitionists at home and abroad: A right to consular assistance and the death penalty. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 17, 51-82. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/meljil17&i=61

Maresca, A. (1965). Considérations sur les derniers développements du droit diplomatique et consulaire. Revue de droit international de sciences diplomatiques et politiques, 43, 323-325.

Maresca, A. (1971). Les rélations consulaires et les fonctions du consul en matière de droit privé. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 134, 105-162.

Maresca, A. (1974). Las relaciones consulares. Aguilar.

McGuinness, M. E. (2008a). Medellín v. Texas. American Journal of International Law, 102(3), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/20456650

McGuinness, M. E. (2008b). Three narratives of Medellin v. Texas. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 31(2), 227-246. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/sujtnlr31&i=233

Meron, T. (1995). Extraterritoriality of human rights treaties. The American Journal of International Law, 89(1), 78-82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2203895?seq=1

Meron, T. (2006). The humanization of international law. Brill Nijhoff.

Ruiz Miguel, C. (2018). The “Del Río Prada” Judgements and the Problem of the Enforcement of ECtHR Decisions. In M. Pérez Manzano, J. Lascuraín Sánchez, & M. Mínguez Rosique (eds.), Multilevel protection of the principle of legality in criminal law (pp. 213-234). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63865-2_11

Nowak, M. (2012). On the creation of world court of human rights. National Taiwan University Law Review, 7, 257-292. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ntulr7&i=257

Pausch, M. (2014). Democratization and elitism in the EU: Two opposing trends (Guest-Editor’s introduction to the topical collection on “The Future of Europe”). European Journal of Futures Research, 2(56), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0056-3

Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory constitutionalism: the function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19(3), 579-610. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lejint19&i=585

Petit de Gabriel, E. (2017a). Lebois v. Bulgaria: An Almost Obiter Dictum of Fundamental Character on the Consular Rights of Foreign Nationals. Yearbook of Diplomatic and Consular Law, 2. http://yearbookdiplomaticlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2017-Eulalia.pdf

Petit de Gabriel, E. (2017b). Los derechos consulares de los extranjeros detenidos: ¿Nuevas cartas em la baraja de los derechos fundamentales. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 33. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.33.07

Petit de Gabriel, E. (2003). Las exigencias de humanidad en el derecho internacional tradicional (1789-1939). Tecnos.

Pillet, A. (1889). Des Droits de la puissance protectrice sur l’administration intéri-eure de l’Etat protégé. Révue générale de droit international public, 2, 583-608.

Pillet, A. (1894). Le droit international public: Ses elements constitutifs, son domaine, son objet. Revue Générale de Droit International, 1, 1-31.

Pintos, E. V. (2016). Curso de derecho diplomatico y consular. Tecnos.

Pratap, R. (2017). Provisional Measures and the Jadhav Case. Groningen Journal of International Law, 5(2), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.21827/5a6afa3c5e843

Politis, N. (1925). Le problème des limitations de la souveraineté et la théorie de l’abus des droits dans les rapports internationaux. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789028604322_01

Queralt Jiménez, A. (2018). Chronicle of an enforcement foretold: The effectiveness of the del río prada ECtHR judgement in Spain. In: M. Pérez Manzano, J. Lascuraín Sánchez, & M. Mínguez Rosique (eds.), Multilevel protection of the principle of legality in criminal law (pp. 195-212). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63865-2_11

Rea Falcón, M. E. (2017). Los extranjeros en Estados Unidos de América y el cumplimiento del artículo 36 de la Convención de Viena sobre relaciones consulares. RDUNED: revista de derecho UNED, 20, 527-557. http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:RDUNED-2017-20-5110/Extranjeros.pdf

Romano, C. P. R. (2017). Avena and other Mexican nationals (México V. United States of America), 2003 and request for interpretation of the judgment of 31 March 2004 in the case concerning Avena and other Mexican nationals (Mexico V. United States of America), 2008. In P. A. Wojcikiewicz, & J.-M. Sorel (eds.), Latin America and the International Court of Justice: Contributions to international law (pp. 183-194). Routledge.

Roukounas, E. I., & Hague Academy of International Law. (2003). Facteurs privés et droit international public. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Sáenz de Santamaría, P. A. (2014, enero). Acerca del papel del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos y de la tentación de desacreditar al mensajero (a propósito de la STEDH (Gran Sala) en el asunto Del Río Prada c. España). Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, (33), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.33.2014.13041.

Scelle, G. (1932). Precis de droit des gens. Sirey.

Scott, J. B. (1930). The individual, the state, the international community. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921-1969), 15-32.

Sicilianos, L.-A. (2014). The involvement of the European Court of Human Rights in the implementation of its judgments: Recent developments under Article 46 ECHR. Netherlands quarterly of human rights, 32(3), 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016934411403200303

Simma, B. (1994). From Bilateralism to Community Interests. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789041104199_02

Soo, A. (2016). Potential remedies for violation of the right to counsel in criminal proceedings: Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU (22 October2013) and its output in national legislation. European Criminal Law Review, 6(3), 284-307. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-3-284/potential-remedies-for-violation-of-the-right-to-counsel-in-criminal-proceedings-article-12-of-the-directive-2013-48-eu-22-october2013-and-its-output-in-national-legislation-volume-6-2016-issue-3

Soo, A. (2017). Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU: A starting point for discussion on a common understanding of the criteria for effective remedies of violation of the right to counsel. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 25(1), 31-51. https://brill.com/view/journals/eccl/25/1/article-p31_3.xml?body=contentSummary-44180

Soo, A. (2017). How are the member states progressing on transposition of Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer? An inquiry conducted among the member states with the special focus on how Article 12 is transposed. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8(1), 64-76. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2032284417699294

Soo, A. (2018). (Effective) Remedies for a violation of the right to counsel during criminal proceedings in the European Union: An empirical study. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 18-60. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3128785#

Stuart, G. (1934). Le Droit et la pratique diplomatiques et consulaires. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 48, 459-570.

Teubner, G. (ed.) (1997). Global law without a state. Dartmouth.

Torres Bernárdez, S. (1963). La Convention de Vienne sur les relations consulaires (La Conférence des Nations Unies sur les relations consulaires). Annuaire français de droit international, 9(1), 78-118. https://doi.org/10.3406/afdi.1963.1025

Trechsel, S. (2004). A world court for human rights? Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, 1(1). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=njihr

Venneman, R. (1965). La fin des consulats. Revue Belge de Droit International, 1, 148-161. http://rbdi.bruylant.be/public/modele/rbdi/content/rbdi_2016/RBDI%201965.1%20-%20pp.%20148%20a%20161%20-%20R.%20Venneman.pdf

Villegas Delgado, C. (2020). La Corte Internacional de Justicia y la paulatina humanización del derecho consular: De Breard a Jadhav. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 39. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.39.04

Von Bogdandy, A. (2006). Constitutionalism in international law: Comment on a proposal from Germany. Harvard International Law Journal, 47(1), 223-242. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hilj47&i=231

Walter, C. (2007). International Law in a Process of Constitutionalization. In A. Nollkaemper, & J. E. Nijman (eds.), New perspectives on the divide between national and international law (pp. 191-215). Oxford University Press on Demand.

Wasilewski, T., & Żenkiewicz, M. (2018, February). The Jadhav case, India v. Pakistan (ongoing case at the International Court of Justice, 2017). Comparative Law Review, 23, 283-293. https://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2017.013

Wright, Q. (1932). The legal position and functions of consuls, part. II. American Journal of International Law, 26(S1), 190-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/2213739

Ziccardi Capaldo, G. (2008). The pillars of global law. Ashgate.

Žourek, J. (1962). Le statut et les fonctions des consuls. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 106, 357-497.

Publicado

22-06-2021

Como Citar

Petit de Gabriel, E. W. (2021). A relação entre direito de assistência consular e direitos humanos: uma contribuição europeia para a humanização do direito internacional. Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL], 22(1), 11–54. https://doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.27700

Edição

Seção

Direitos humanos e cenário internacional